Monday, April 1, 2013

Five Ways Investing in Real Estate Can Save You Money


Five Ways Investing in Real Estate Can Save You Money

Posted: 03/29/2013 12:11 pm



According to Brad Hettich, President and CEO of Commercial Lending X, there are several ways to save money fast, but chief among them is investing in real estate. "You should dip into your savings or take out a loan that you can repay, and always invest long-term," explains Hettich. "Real estate is a great example of that." Brad's logic is that with so many available properties that accommodate any budget, real estate is among the most effective ways to save money.
However, it is vital that if you cannot purchase property in cash, that you find a lender that specializes in your financial needs and price range. "With a stable income and a set amount of income put aside every month, you have the advantage of not only determining your own budget, but in deciding how much you want to pay for property," explained Hettich. Companies like Commercial Lending X work directly with local banks that were burned in the mortgage crisis, making it easier for them to provide both commercial and residential loans to consumers.
"Because we work with both consumers and banks, we stress five reasons why real estate investment will save you money in the long run," Hettich explained. "Lower taxes, positive cash flow, use leverage, equity growth, and the benefits of inflation."
1. Lower Taxes
There are several tax incentives for real estate investors, with deductions for property that can often be used to offset wage income. These tax breaks for real estate investment often allow property owners to turn a loss into a profit from all the money they save from deductions. These deductions can include any actual costs involved in financing, managing and operating the property, to include maintenance, repairs, property management fees, travel, advertising, and utilities. However, other great ways to save money on tax rates include government-instrumented deductions:
  • Depreciation: Property depreciates in value over time, enabling you to deduct some of the home's costs.
  • Interest: All mortgage payment interest is deductible.
  • Insurance: Premiums for any type of insurance are deductible.
2. Positive Cash Flow
When it comes to real estate investment, there are two ways to save money: pre-tax and after-tax positive cash flow. A pre-tax positive cash flow is when income received is greater than expenses, and an after-tax positive cash flow is when your expenses are more than your collected income, but the tax breaks bring you back in the black. Either way, real estate investment, if budgeted properly, can save you money and earn a nice profit along the way.
3. Use Leverage
According to Hettich, "Never spend a dime on your real estate investment unless you have to, because the only way to make money is to have money." Leverage is an important aspect of saving money through real estate investment because a real estate investor uses leverage to increase their assets without spending their own money. "Using your leverage to gain a large amount of equity is the difference between the actual worth of the property and the balanced owed on the mortgage."
Companies like Brad's help real estate investors secure loans where they can use the bank's money to purchase property and increase its equity without spending a dime of their own money. "Our goal is the same as any real estate investor: create value with as little expense as possible."
4. Equity Growth
The best way to save money, and earn money, is to build up equity for real estate investments. That way, with high equity you are able to save on your mortgage while earning a nice chunk of profit. As Hettich puts it, "Don't be afraid to sell and invest in something new once you've reached your equity goal. Just as long as you have the financial leeway to do it."
5. The Benefits of Inflation
When investing in real estate, a great way to identify potential savings is by researching the inflation rates for the area. "As commodities increase in value, so does the price of your home," Hettich explained, "which means that over time you reduce the amount you have to spend to maintain the property."
Generally speaking, inflation can help you save money on your real estate investment because as rent increases, your mortgage costs will remain static, which means you will save money on maintenance costs with the increased cash flow from the rent.
Ultimately though, despite the fact that these are five great ways to save money through real estate investment, they do come with their risks as well. According to Hettich, "Any time you convert cash into an asset, it becomes more difficult to get your money back. But that's the risk you take in investing because not only can you save for retirement with a regular cash flow, the reduced taxes will ensure its long-term viability to save you money."

Tuesday, March 26, 2013


Study: Nearness to Public Transportation Strengthens Home Values

A study released by American Public Transportation Association (APTA) and the National Association of Realtors(NAR) suggested homes in close proximity to public transportation were much more resilient when faced with price declines during the recession.
Data from the study found property values for homes near public transportation performed 41.6 percent better on average compared to homes not in “transit sheds.”
The study compared property values from 2006 to 2011 for homes located near public transit systems and homes that were in a non-transit areas in five regions—Boston, Chicago, Minneapolis-St.Paul, Phoenix, and San Francisco.
Overall, the study found homes near public transportation in those regions were more stable and experienced smaller price declines during the recession.
Boston residential properties located near public transit systems outperformed other properties in the area by 129 percent, according to the report.
In Minneapolis-St Paul, homes near public transit areas were 48 percent higher than other properties in the region. The remaining three metros also saw significantly higher values when located in transit sheds: San Francisco (+37 percent), Phoenix (+37 percent), and Chicago (+30 percent).
“When homes are located near public transportation, it is the equivalent of creating housing as desirable as beach front property,” said APTA President and CEO Michael Melaniphy. “This study shows that consumers are choosing neighborhoods with high-frequency public transportation because it provides access to up to five times as many jobs per square mile as compared to other areas in a given region. Other attractive amenities in these neighborhoods include lower transportation costs, walkable areas and robust transportation choices.”
Homeowners in Boston who live near public transit systems save an average of $351 each month, the most out of the five regions, the NAR reported. San Francisco was a close second in terms of monthly savings and averaged $346. The monthly savings in Phoenix was the smallest, at $175.
“Transportation plays an important role in real estate and housing decisions, and the data suggests that residential real-estate near public transit will remain attractive to buyers going forward. A sound transportation system not only benefits individual property owners, but also creates the foundation for a community’s long-term economic well being,” said Lawrence Yun, NAR’s chief economist.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Can I Sell My Parents’ House and Avoid the Capital Gain Tax?

Can I Sell My Parents’ House and Avoid the Capital Gain Tax?

I inherited my parents’ home, which is worth more than my current one. I’m thinking of claiming my parents’ home as my principal place of residence so that I can sell it in two years and not have to pay capital gains. I’m changing my homeowner’s exemption on my tax bill to my parents’ house. What other things do I need to do so that I won’t have to pay capital gains taxes on my parents’ house when I sell it?

Why go to the bother of trying to provide proof of your living in your parents’ home when you could probably sell the house now and pay no or little capital gain tax? When you inherited your parents’ house, you got a step up in its basis. In other words, the fair market value (FMV) of the property on the date of the death of your last parent is its new cost basis. And if it is more beneficial to you, the government says you can select another date to lock in the FMV as long as the date is between the date of death and the nine months afterwards. If the difference between the FMV and the price you sell the house for is not that great, the homeowner’s exemption and principal residence issues are moot. If you sell the house sometime during the nine months following your parent’s death, the price the house sells for essentially is its FMV. Thus, if you use the date of sale as the FMV date, the sale price and basis are the same, meaning there is no capital gain tax.

You could also sell your parents’ home, sell your own house and use the money realized on both to purchase another home and likely pay no capital gains. As long as you’ve lived in your current home for at least two years out of the past five years, it qualifies for the exemption on capital gain tax ($250,000 if you are single, $500,000 if you are married). If you really want to wait two years before selling the house, you will have to physically move into it in order to claim the homeowner’s exemption when you sell it. But I don’t think that would be in your best financial interest.

Rob Seltzer is principal of Robert Seltzer, CPA, PFS, in Beverly Hills. You can reach him at (310) 278-9944. Have a question for a CPA? Ask it here.

In accordance with IRS Circular 230, the information on this website is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used as or considered a "covered opinion" or other written tax advice and should not be relied upon for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code; promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or tax-related matter(s) addressed herein; for IRS audit, tax dispute or other purposes.
 

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Is US Economy Flirting With 'Modern-Day Depression'?



CNBC.com
| 06 Oct 2011 | 03:26 PM ET

While economists have made no secret of their fears that another recession is about to strike, the real danger could be worse
Instead, the country could be headed for a 21st century version of a depression, an economic term that, unlike a recession, defies a standard definition but instead conjures images of soup lines, 25 percent unemployment and a devastated economy.
A drastic view? Perhaps. But with the US economy facing growth well below expectations two years after a recession, and an increasingly ominous European debt crisis, the superlatives being used to describe conditions are gaining in intensity.
“Here we are today, with a severe recession (2007-09) followed by the weakest recovery on record and now on the precipice of another economic downturn,” David Rosenberg, senior economist and strategist at Gluskin Sheff in Toronto wrote in a special analysis. “This is a modern-day depression, not entirely dissimilar to Japan’s post-bubble experience of the past two decades.”
Rosenberg takes issue with the standard issue of a recession being two consecutive quarters of negative growth, and rather says it measures peaks in sales activity, jobs, industrial production and income growth.
The US already has had something of a lost decade, Rosenberg reasons, citing stock values still around 1998 levels and little net job growth.
This is occurring even despite unprecedented policy measures including a massive monetary easing campaign from the Federal Reserve and about $800 billion in government stimulus.
”Simply put, an economic depression occurs only once it becomes painfully obvious that the markets and the economy are failing to respond to repeated bouts of policy stimulus,” Rosenberg said.
While Rosenberg is certainly out of the consensus in discussing a depression, he is not alone.
Harvard professor and economist Niall Ferguson recently projected a “mild depression” (if there can be such a thing) as have other economists including the noted “Dr. Doom” Nouriel Roubini and HSBC’s Stephen King. The latter two, though, have raised risks of a depression and have not stated, like Rosenberg, that one is actually under way.
Most economists, rather, have confined their predictions to recessions and mild ones at that.
Jan Hatzius at Goldman Sachs recently said there’s a 40 percent chance of recession, but even at that sees “the main downside scenario as a shallow recession followed by a slow recovery.” Similarly, Deutsche Bank economists recently noted that if leaders fail to find satisfactory solutions to the European debt crisis, “the prospects for a moderate dip in GDP will grow.”
Some economists, though, have been doing their utmost to find silver linings that defy recession probabilities. Jeffrey Greenberg at Nomura Securities, for instance, cited a rise in construction spending in August to reason that second-quarter gross domestic product growth would come in at a decidedly nonrecessionary 2.5 percent.
Representing many of the economic voices out there, Citigroup’s Robert V. DiClemente pondered whether the current period should redefine the way recoveries are considered.
“Perhaps we should label this period a convalescence instead of a recovery in recognition of the ongoing attention to saving, deleveraging and balance sheet rebuilding,” DiClemente said in a note. “Flat is the new up and subpar growth has redefined optimism.”
Yet it is some of those very conditions—the slashing of consumer debt (or deleveraging), reticence to spend and general risk aversion—that helps drive Rosenberg’s depression case.
“It will take time and shared burden by lenders, households and future generations of taxpayers before we hit bottom in this credit contraction,” he wrote. “Time is certainly going to be a big part of the solution, and history tells us that the deleveraging cycles last years.”
Indeed, ominous signs abound.
Strategists at Bank of America Merrill Lynch earlier this week published a note with the sub-heading of, “The chart that keeps us up at night.” The particular chart in question tracks the bond yield differences, or spreads, in the European financial credit default swaps market .
The instruments are insurance against debt defaults and the spreads, BofAML says, have gone 0.70 percentage points or so beyond their levels at the 2008 financial crisis apex. The same spread for US financials is only about 0.40 percentage points away from late 2008, while high yield spreads are right at the point they were the day before Lehman Brothers went bankrupt.
Scary stuff, even for a firm saying that the chance of a recession remains below 50 percent.
“The experience of 2008 has taught us that once the level of distress in the financial system reaches a certain level, it can become an uncontrollable force, with the potential to push market participants into deleveraging as counterparty exposures are being cut,” the firm said.
“We may not be at that point yet, but we believe we might not be too far away from it, and with the markets behaving the way they have over the past few weeks, we could get there quickly.”
_____________________________________________

Pressure on lenders drastically decreases new foreclosures in New York City



October 06, 2011 10:00AM
alternate text
Source: PropertyShark
New foreclosure auctions in New York City plummeted during the third quarter, according to a PropertyShark.com report released today, but that's far from a sign of an improvement in the housing market.

Just 207 new foreclosures were filed in the third quarter, down 33 percent from the 311 filed in the second quarter, and down 69 percent from the 659 new filings in the third quarter of 2010. About half the new foreclosures were filed on co-ops.

Queens led all boroughs with 82 foreclosures, or 39 percent of the city's foreclosures. However, the number was still 28 percent less than it was last quarter, and 79 percent below the figure recorded in the prior year quarter.

In Manhattan and Brooklyn the quarter-over-quarter decrease was 45 percent, while Bronx saw a 26 percent decline. Staten Island foreclosures remained constant.

However, PropertyShark said the decreases were not necessarily due to an improved market. Instead, they were likely caused by the increased pressure on banks and lenders to pay close attention to the paperwork involved in foreclosure filings, thereby slowing the process.

"We believe the drop is due to increased legal pressure on the banks by the state and federal governments," said PropertyShark founder Matthew Haines. "As we enter a new recession, we expect homeowners to continue to have trouble making payments on mortgages that continue to far exceed the value of the underlying houses."-- Adam Fusfeld

Monday, September 19, 2011

Wealthy communities in NYC, Florida area could fall under Obama tax plan 

Wealthy communities in NYC, Florida area could fall under Obama tax plan

September 19, 2011 04:00PM


Above Sutton Place and Oyster Bay, N.Y., below Fort Lauderdale and Bay Harbor Island, Fla.

With President Barack Obama proposing a new tax on millionaires, Forbes investigated what areas of the country have the highest concentration of high-income residents.

The data indicates that the New York City area and South Florida were among the top spots for the rich.

According to the analysis conducted by Forbes, four out of the five wealthiest communities in the country were in New York City area or in South Florida based on estimated net worth.

The analysis also looked at other factors such as relative tax burden and charitable giving. On Fisher Island, Key Largo, Boca Grande and Longboat Key, the wealthy don't pay more than 25 percent in taxes.

Many residents in the New York City area also aren't very charitable. Particularly in some rich New Jersey towns, residents give away 2 percent or less of their income, compared to an average of 2.9 percent. The same is true for Tribeca and a part of White Plains.

While in Tribeca, only 17 percent of income comes from investments, reflecting the younger demographic of the neighborhood, according to the analysis, on Fisher Island that number is 85 percent, and in Boca Raton and Key Largo, places where residents have already accumulated their wealth, it's 75 percent or more of income. [Forbes]

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Mortgage rates reach historic lows

Mortgage rates reach historic lows

September 01, 2011 02:30PM

Mortgage rates are declining further amid continued weak economic and housing data, according to Freddie Mac's Primary Mortgage Market Survey, released today. While the 30-year fixed rate held steady, the five-year adjustable rate mortgage set a new all-time record low having fallen for the eighth consecutive week and now standing at 2.96 percent.

For the second week in a row, the 30-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 4.22 percent for the week ending today. Last year at this time, the 30-year FRM averaged 4.32 percent.

Fifteen-year fixed-rate mortgages this week averaged 3.39 percent, down from last week when it averaged 3.44 percent. A year ago at this time, the 15-year FRM averaged 3.83 percent.

"Weaker economic data reports eased upward pressure on mortgage rates this week and kept them at or near all-time record lows," said Frank Nothaft, vice president and chief economist for Freddie Mac. "The economy grew at a slower rate of 1 percent in the second quarter than was originally reported due to a smaller increase in inventories and fewer exports. In addition, consumer confidence in August fell to the lowest reading since April 2009, according to the Conference Board." -- Katherine Clarke

Apartment for Sale